Stupid Questions Thread

All training and programming related queries and banter here

Moderators: mgil, chromoly, Manveer

Post Reply
User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1361

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:22 pm

Testiclaw wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 12:34 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:50 am @Testiclaw

What do pullovers accomplish when trying to improve thoracic extension?
I use them as a weighted stretch, and eventually add a small foam roller under the middle-back.

I don't think unweighted stretches are that useful, but a loaded movement that we can progressively load while also progressively increase range of motion and stretching can be useful when coupled with learning how to overhead squat.
Thanks!

I'd begun to consider it like a cousin to front raises, straight-arm pulldowns, and the ab wheel. My training purposes are/were different, so I never considered it as a thoracic extension stretch.

User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1362

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:24 pm

DCR wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 1:52 pm Pullovers are to the 20 rep squat program as power cleans are to the SSNLP.
How do you mean? I bought the brown book (second-hand) for the overhead press and power clean chapters, but never got well acquainted with SS programming. I also decided not to train the power clean, though I don't recall the reason why.

User avatar
Hanley
Strength Nerd
Posts: 8753
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:35 pm
Age: 46

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1363

Post by Hanley » Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:56 pm

thoradicus wrote: Sat Apr 17, 2021 8:05 pmWhile we are on the topic of fatigue resistance...how would reps/set be programmed when I could do I think 20 reps @ 70% for the squat and bench?

Based on your post here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2422&p=196761&hilit ... nt#p196683

Assuming max recoverable volume is 40 reps, i am supposed to do 13-15x3 or something? Sorry if I am butchering this.
20RM @ 70% is pretty outlier. I don't think I'd use 70% all that much. Nothing wrong with sets of 12-15...but they're really far from a strength stimulus (and I tend to make barbell "hypertrophy" a hypertrophy/strength hybrid sorta thing).

I'd probably use 15RM as the your "intensity floor" for barbell work (I have no idea what percentage of your 1RM that is). And I'd probably do 3-6ish sets (depending on your intersession recovery ability) of variable reps in the RPE 6-8 zone.

User avatar
DanCR
Registered User
Posts: 3703
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:06 am
Location: Louisiana / New York
Age: 45

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1364

Post by DanCR » Sun Apr 18, 2021 3:25 pm

Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:24 pm
DCR wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 1:52 pm Pullovers are to the 20 rep squat program as power cleans are to the SSNLP.
How do you mean? I bought the brown book (second-hand) for the overhead press and power clean chapters, but never got well acquainted with SS programming. I also decided not to train the power clean, though I don't recall the reason why.
In that the purveyors of said programs absolutely insist on their inclusion, but the explanations for why never made much sense.

ETA: I’ve got no beef with pullovers. Was just something that occurred to me.

User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1365

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:25 pm

DCR wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 3:25 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:24 pm
DCR wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 1:52 pm Pullovers are to the 20 rep squat program as power cleans are to the SSNLP.
How do you mean? I bought the brown book (second-hand) for the overhead press and power clean chapters, but never got well acquainted with SS programming. I also decided not to train the power clean, though I don't recall the reason why.
In that the purveyors of said programs absolutely insist on their inclusion, but the explanations for why never made much sense.

ETA: I’ve got no beef with pullovers. Was just something that occurred to me.
Gotcha.

I'm accustomed to seeing pullovers programmed as a "vanity" movement, but I saw something on 'Claw's IG that made me ask the question.

Whenever I have time to do them, I do them for reasons unrelated to vanity. So I was surprised to finally see someone actually program them for a movement-related purpose.

ChasingCurls69
Registered User
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:43 am

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1366

Post by ChasingCurls69 » Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:28 pm

Usung pullovers as a thoracic stretch because it's a loaded movement is pretty fucking cool.

User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1367

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:07 pm

ChasingCurls69 wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:28 pm Usung pullovers as a thoracic stretch because it's a loaded movement is pretty fucking cool.
Yep.

I've used plate raises sporadically to relieve some anterior discomfort before (without knowing why, beyond instinct), but never thought about the effect of that movement (or similar movements -- like pullovers) on the posterior side.

Might throw some in tonight.

User avatar
Hanley
Strength Nerd
Posts: 8753
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:35 pm
Age: 46

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1368

Post by Hanley » Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:41 pm

Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:25 pmSo I was surprised to finally see someone actually program them for a movement-related purpose.
I love them. They were my primary upper body movement back when I threw javelin. Great for overhead strength. They're also great for trunk-stability/anti-hyper-extension.

thoradicus
Registered User
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:03 am

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1369

Post by thoradicus » Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:43 pm

Hanley wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:56 pm
thoradicus wrote: Sat Apr 17, 2021 8:05 pmWhile we are on the topic of fatigue resistance...how would reps/set be programmed when I could do I think 20 reps @ 70% for the squat and bench?

Based on your post here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2422&p=196761&hilit ... nt#p196683

Assuming max recoverable volume is 40 reps, i am supposed to do 13-15x3 or something? Sorry if I am butchering this.
20RM @ 70% is pretty outlier. I don't think I'd use 70% all that much. Nothing wrong with sets of 12-15...but they're really far from a strength stimulus (and I tend to make barbell "hypertrophy" a hypertrophy/strength hybrid sorta thing).

I'd probably use 15RM as the your "intensity floor" for barbell work (I have no idea what percentage of your 1RM that is). And I'd probably do 3-6ish sets (depending on your intersession recovery ability) of variable reps in the RPE 6-8 zone.
Thanks! Is there any intensity ceiling though? Anything above 80% will just be singles @ 6-8?

The 3-6 variable sets is for the whole range of %s and not just 15RM, right?

User avatar
Testiclaw
Registered User
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:28 am

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1370

Post by Testiclaw » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:02 pm

I think the "ribcage expansion" and "Arnold pec development" qualities of pullovers variations are all bullshit, but paired with a roller under the back they can be useful for overhead positions.

I like to pair them with seated snatch grip BTN presses, focusing on leaning forward, keeping heavy feet, and really emphasizing upper back activity and internal rotation.

ChasingCurls69
Registered User
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:43 am

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1371

Post by ChasingCurls69 » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:22 pm

Testiclaw wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:02 pm I think the "ribcage expansion" and "Arnold pec development" qualities of pullovers variations are all bullshit, but paired with a roller under the back they can be useful for overhead positions.

I like to pair them with seated snatch grip BTN presses, focusing on leaning forward, keeping heavy feet, and really emphasizing upper back activity and internal rotation.
How do you have people perform the pullovers? The closest I've done is the SS-style lying tricep extensions with either DBs or an EZ curl bar.

User avatar
Hanley
Strength Nerd
Posts: 8753
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:35 pm
Age: 46

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1372

Post by Hanley » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:26 pm

thoradicus wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:43 pmThanks! Is there any intensity ceiling though?
No. Just be smart about keeping fatigue in check.
thoradicus wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:43 pmAnything above 80% will just be singles @ 6-8?
Eh. You're an outlier. I don't feel comfortable giving general advice to you. Post an amrap with 80% of one of your lifts and I'll have a better sense of what reps per set I'd use.
thoradicus wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:43 pm The 3-6 variable sets is for the whole range of %s and not just 15RM, right?
I'd probably increase # of sets as intensity increases. So, maybe 7-8 triples @ 7-8RM, 7-8 doubles @ 5RM etc. I'm pulling those set counts out of my ass....but hopefully you get the idea (more sets, lower average set RPE as intensity gets higher).

User avatar
Testiclaw
Registered User
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:28 am

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1373

Post by Testiclaw » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:40 pm

ChasingCurls69 wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:22 pm
Testiclaw wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:02 pm I think the "ribcage expansion" and "Arnold pec development" qualities of pullovers variations are all bullshit, but paired with a roller under the back they can be useful for overhead positions.

I like to pair them with seated snatch grip BTN presses, focusing on leaning forward, keeping heavy feet, and really emphasizing upper back activity and internal rotation.
How do you have people perform the pullovers? The closest I've done is the SS-style lying tricep extensions with either DBs or an EZ curl bar.


Arms stay straight, locked.

Feet on bench, abs tight, trying to keep the lower back rounded a bit.

Lower as far as able, get a few deep breaths, return to starting position.

lehman906
Registered User
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:31 am
Age: 49

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1374

Post by lehman906 » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:49 pm

Hanley wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:41 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:25 pmSo I was surprised to finally see someone actually program them for a movement-related purpose.
I love them. They were my primary upper body movement back when I threw javelin. Great for overhead strength. They're also great for trunk-stability/anti-hyper-extension.
Overhead strength just for throwing? Or do you feel like they did/would help with pressing as well?

User avatar
Hanley
Strength Nerd
Posts: 8753
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:35 pm
Age: 46

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1375

Post by Hanley » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:17 pm

lehman906 wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:49 pm Overhead strength just for throwing?
Yeah, I'd guess throws, tennis/volleyball serves, swimming, etc. Probably not great transfer to pressing.

User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1376

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:18 pm

Hanley wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:41 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:25 pmSo I was surprised to finally see someone actually program them for a movement-related purpose.
I love them. They were my primary upper body movement back when I threw javelin. Great for overhead strength. They're also great for trunk-stability/anti-hyper-extension.
Did you use weight percentages for programming?

User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1377

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:20 pm

Testiclaw wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:40 pm

Arms stay straight, locked.

Feet on bench, abs tight, trying to keep the lower back rounded a bit.

Lower as far as able, get a few deep breaths, return to starting position.
I have a half-roller I wanna try this setup with (my full-size roller is too big, and I haven't used it in years, so I'm not inclined to buy another).

Just curious: why not feet on the floor?

User avatar
Hanley
Strength Nerd
Posts: 8753
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:35 pm
Age: 46

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1378

Post by Hanley » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:38 pm

Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:18 pm
Hanley wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:41 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:25 pmSo I was surprised to finally see someone actually program them for a movement-related purpose.
I love them. They were my primary upper body movement back when I threw javelin. Great for overhead strength. They're also great for trunk-stability/anti-hyper-extension.
Did you use weight percentages for programming?
No. Probably should have. My college S&C training was...less than ideal.

The elite guys track/test pullover 1RM. But they do a crazy ballistic version ( @Testiclaw, avert your eyes):


User avatar
Renascent
Desperado
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
Age: 39

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1379

Post by Renascent » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:46 pm

Hanley wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:38 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:18 pm
Hanley wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:41 pm
Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:25 pmSo I was surprised to finally see someone actually program them for a movement-related purpose.
I love them. They were my primary upper body movement back when I threw javelin. Great for overhead strength. They're also great for trunk-stability/anti-hyper-extension.
Did you use weight percentages for programming?
No. Probably should have. My college S&C training was...less than ideal.

The elite guys track/test pullover 1RM. But they do a crazy ballistic version ( @Testiclaw, avert your eyes):

JFC.

Even though you said you used it as a primary movement, that was not what I pictured.

User avatar
Testiclaw
Registered User
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:28 am

Re: Stupid Questions Thread

#1380

Post by Testiclaw » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:59 pm

Renascent wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:20 pm
Testiclaw wrote: Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:40 pm

Arms stay straight, locked.

Feet on bench, abs tight, trying to keep the lower back rounded a bit.

Lower as far as able, get a few deep breaths, return to starting position.
I have a half-roller I wanna try this setup with (my full-size roller is too big, and I haven't used it in years, so I'm not inclined to buy another).

Just curious: why not feet on the floor?
So feet on the bench makes it easier to keep the pelvis tucked and lower back rounded, so we can focus more of the extension in the thoracic area (rather than compensate with an arch).

Post Reply