100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
- chrisd
- Registered User
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:06 pm
- Location: Ponyville
- Age: 59
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
All pointless.
According to the prison channels on Youtube, the most successful self defence technique is know to those who are most likely to be attacked. One such individual was always rude to people, stole from fellow inmates and didn't pay his debts. His simple defence was to keep a ready supply of faeces and, when threatened, strip naked and cover himself in same.
According to the prison channels on Youtube, the most successful self defence technique is know to those who are most likely to be attacked. One such individual was always rude to people, stole from fellow inmates and didn't pay his debts. His simple defence was to keep a ready supply of faeces and, when threatened, strip naked and cover himself in same.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:31 am
- Age: 49
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
You’re right. I really didn’t capture the subtlety and nuance that SS is known for.
- augeleven
- Registered User
- Posts: 4463
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:47 pm
- Location: 9th level
- Age: 43
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
Power move for interviews.chrisd wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 11:21 pm All pointless.
According to the prison channels on Youtube, the most successful self defence technique is know to those who are most likely to be attacked. One such individual was always rude to people, stole from fellow inmates and didn't pay his debts. His simple defence was to keep a ready supply of faeces and, when threatened, strip naked and cover himself in same.
@Anaphase needs this in his repertoire for his inevitable move to New Mexico…
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:35 pm
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
chrisd wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 11:21 pm All pointless.
According to the prison channels on Youtube, the most successful self defence technique is know to those who are most likely to be attacked. One such individual was always rude to people, stole from fellow inmates and didn't pay his debts. His simple defence was to keep a ready supply of faeces and, when threatened, strip naked and cover himself in same.
One of the underappreciated benefits of SS style bulking is it leaves you with a steady supply of feces, ready-to-hand for self-defense or works of creative expression.
- KyleSchuant
- Take It Easy
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Age: 52
- Contact:
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
- Scott AcostaThe way I see it, as coaches we can better serve our trainees by working with them for years, versus against them for months.
That looks dangerously like heresy.
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8493
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
Of note:
There is a TRT link right on the banner for the SS Gyms home page now. Wild.
There is a TRT link right on the banner for the SS Gyms home page now. Wild.
- quikky
- Registered User
- Posts: 1424
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:42 am
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
That's... Really strange.
The Program works so well you only need perfect sleep, a massive caloric surplus, perfect form, TRT, professional coaching, and 10-15 minute rest between sets to do it.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:35 pm
- KyleSchuant
- Take It Easy
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Age: 52
- Contact:
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-1
SS have come out with this article, which is this long meandering rant on "why you won't do the program, part I". And they go on about people thinking that you need 712 different isolation exercises.
Honestly I have very rarely heard such an objection from anyone in a gym.
I never had anyone refuse to do the lifts because it didn't target their biceps. It's almost just that it's hard - and a distant second, some more timid types, especially oldies, who are scared of getting hurt. But those last are scared of machines and going for a walk, too - so maybe really they're just worried about it being hard, too. Look at the dropout rates for university and you understand why primary and secondary school are compulsory - it's not that 14 years have some carefully-crafted critique of why they don't want to be there, they'd just rather be fucking around.
I think you get some little groups of people who spend so much time talking to each-other they just make up this bizarre caricature of people outside the group which bears no relationship to reality. SS, lefties, righties, whatever.
SS have come out with this article, which is this long meandering rant on "why you won't do the program, part I". And they go on about people thinking that you need 712 different isolation exercises.
Honestly I have very rarely heard such an objection from anyone in a gym.
I never had anyone refuse to do the lifts because it didn't target their biceps. It's almost just that it's hard - and a distant second, some more timid types, especially oldies, who are scared of getting hurt. But those last are scared of machines and going for a walk, too - so maybe really they're just worried about it being hard, too. Look at the dropout rates for university and you understand why primary and secondary school are compulsory - it's not that 14 years have some carefully-crafted critique of why they don't want to be there, they'd just rather be fucking around.
I think you get some little groups of people who spend so much time talking to each-other they just make up this bizarre caricature of people outside the group which bears no relationship to reality. SS, lefties, righties, whatever.
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8493
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
Typical SS article that works a logical circle to support itself.
Let’s take a moment to appreciate this bit though: “stef bradford, PhD, SSC”. It’s necessary to do the weird flex of denying the “capitalize proper nouns” rule with a name but leaving it intact with the superlatives.
Nonetheless, that article is the same rambling shit that’s been said before. Nothing new.
Let’s take a moment to appreciate this bit though: “stef bradford, PhD, SSC”. It’s necessary to do the weird flex of denying the “capitalize proper nouns” rule with a name but leaving it intact with the superlatives.
Nonetheless, that article is the same rambling shit that’s been said before. Nothing new.
- Renascent
- Desperado
- Posts: 2982
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am
- Age: 39
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
Serious question: is there a point to her/them doing that (refusing to capitalize names)?
- mbasic
- Registered User
- Posts: 9347
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
- Age: 104
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:06 pm
- Location: Ashland, MA
- Age: 44
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
I vaguely recall hearing something about wanting the focus to be on her work not her akin to feminist author bell hooks.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:16 pm
- Age: 57
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
Right, because there's no better way to draw focus or attention away from yourself than by doing some very simple, basic thing completely differently than the way everyone else does it.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:45 am
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
https://startingstrength.com/training/t ... or-a-coach
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-4
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-3
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-2
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-1
My fucking god, man. If you guys are going to masturbate in front of everyone at least have the common decency to provide some napkins.
Granted, these aren't as bad as the articles written by that Daniel Oakes fella, but goddamn.
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-4
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-3
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-2
https://startingstrength.com/article/wh ... ram-part-1
My fucking god, man. If you guys are going to masturbate in front of everyone at least have the common decency to provide some napkins.
Granted, these aren't as bad as the articles written by that Daniel Oakes fella, but goddamn.
- KyleSchuant
- Take It Easy
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Age: 52
- Contact:
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
Oakes! I'd forgotten about him. Quite the philosopher.
https://startingstrength.com/author/daniel-oakes
Also: we're not far off 4 years into the 5 years. There appear to be 24 SS gyms. Shouldn't we have 80 SS gyms by now? Is it a linear progression? Or is it like all those pandemic models and it's an exponential! progression, so that 5 years after there's 100 SS gyms every household on the planet will be an SS gym (depending on the, er, exponent)? Do we subtract 2 years for the coronapanic? How does this work?
Note: there are appear to be 99 SSCs worldwide. This number hasn't really moved for... what? Ten years? They endorse some, some quit, some get chucked out, they endorse some more, etc. Might be tricky to have more SS gyms than you have SS coaches.
https://startingstrength.com/author/daniel-oakes
Also: we're not far off 4 years into the 5 years. There appear to be 24 SS gyms. Shouldn't we have 80 SS gyms by now? Is it a linear progression? Or is it like all those pandemic models and it's an exponential! progression, so that 5 years after there's 100 SS gyms every household on the planet will be an SS gym (depending on the, er, exponent)? Do we subtract 2 years for the coronapanic? How does this work?
Note: there are appear to be 99 SSCs worldwide. This number hasn't really moved for... what? Ten years? They endorse some, some quit, some get chucked out, they endorse some more, etc. Might be tricky to have more SS gyms than you have SS coaches.
- mbasic
- Registered User
- Posts: 9347
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
- Age: 104
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
who wrote that first one? It just says "by: [blank] "LKJH wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:47 pm https://startingstrength.com/training/t ... or-a-coach
.
.
.
My fucking god, man. If you guys are going to masturbate in front of everyone at least have the common decency to provide some napkins.
Granted, these aren't as bad as the articles written by that Daniel Oakes fella, but goddamn.
sounds eerily familiar
*throws up in own mouth a little*
"You’re standing outside waiting to see some live music. The line looks long, and you really just want a cold drink and air conditioning. Then the guy bouncing the entrance points to you, and you are escorted inside by some other guys, then pulled to the front of the standing-room pit."
...
"I find you in my car ... "
- mbasic
- Registered User
- Posts: 9347
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
- Age: 104
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
I think the SSC number problem was identified quite a while ago by quite a few people, including The Org.KyleSchuant wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 11:17 pm Note: there are appear to be 99 SSCs worldwide. This number hasn't really moved for... what? Ten years? They endorse some, some quit, some get chucked out, they endorse some more, etc. Might be tricky to have more SS gyms than you have SS coaches.
IIRC, they had an aggressive advertising campaign to get new coaches: some videos, SSC programs, etc.
And then to get another pulse on this type of thing, I looked at the BLOC staff page.
They are about at the same numbers when the the split happened....about 45. (only counting people titled "coach")
I remember looking at this back then, its always been around 45 to just under 50.
Funny too, I see a lot of completely new faces and names on that page. So they must've lost some.
Getting back to SS, I'm guessing that's a bad sign if the gyms have gone up in number, but SSC numbers stagnate.
I was guessing the SSFGs would also work as a recruiting too, for new SSCs, as they would provide a place to teach how to coach, with clients, barbells, and all that in one place. Geographically it makes no sense, because the newly minted SSC would need a new gym, or I guess, the original veteran SSC would move on to elsewhere.
- KyleSchuant
- Take It Easy
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Age: 52
- Contact:
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
It's not necessarily a slight on SS or BLOC themselves that their numbers stagnate. I think I've mentioned before on these boards the big turnover in the fitness industry generally. A trainer friend wrote an article mentioning this,
They do 10 SS seminars a year, don't they? And how many SSCs are made each time? 1-2? So you're getting 10-20 new ones a year.
Basically, unless they make it easier to become an SSC, their numbers stagnate at best, whittle away at worst. Obviously their SS gym apprenticeship thing was an attempt to pump up the pass rate at seminars. Going on the totals, it hasn't worked.
As my trainer friend notes in his article, fitness overall has a low barrier to entry - that's also a low barrier to leaving. The SSC thing is a fairly high barrier as the fitness world goes, but it's not like it's a 5 year medical degree costing $250,000. So you get in to being a trainer and discover that for over 90% of people it's casual part-time work. You get annoyed with medicine, you've given too much to just give up. Even if in ten years you still hate it, you know it'll pay well. But fitness? Much easier to get in to, not a big investment, and actually training people doesn't pay well (though training the trainers does!) Most will just move on.
So again, it's not necessarily SS as such. It's just a tough industry with a big turnover of customers and staff.
Now, let's set aside how lockdowns, inflation, recession etc have gutted the fitness industry across the West and just take those numbers, which were actually from 2012 or so, at face value. Let's also, for the sake of argument, assume the numbers are similar for SSCs. Yeah, yeah, "greater expertise" and all that - but "people who want to get strong using only barbells" is a relatively small market, so it probably comes out about even.Every year 10% of the trainers leave for a variety of reasons. So if you start with 100 trainers by the end of the first year you’d have 90. At the end of the second year you’d have 81. The end of the third year would be 73, and the end of the fourth year would be 65. But then something really bad happens. At the end of the fifth year 70% of those remaining leave. That means that of the 65 who made it to the end of the fourth year only 20 will be left.
They do 10 SS seminars a year, don't they? And how many SSCs are made each time? 1-2? So you're getting 10-20 new ones a year.
Basically, unless they make it easier to become an SSC, their numbers stagnate at best, whittle away at worst. Obviously their SS gym apprenticeship thing was an attempt to pump up the pass rate at seminars. Going on the totals, it hasn't worked.
As my trainer friend notes in his article, fitness overall has a low barrier to entry - that's also a low barrier to leaving. The SSC thing is a fairly high barrier as the fitness world goes, but it's not like it's a 5 year medical degree costing $250,000. So you get in to being a trainer and discover that for over 90% of people it's casual part-time work. You get annoyed with medicine, you've given too much to just give up. Even if in ten years you still hate it, you know it'll pay well. But fitness? Much easier to get in to, not a big investment, and actually training people doesn't pay well (though training the trainers does!) Most will just move on.
So again, it's not necessarily SS as such. It's just a tough industry with a big turnover of customers and staff.
- mbasic
- Registered User
- Posts: 9347
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
- Age: 104
Re: 100 Starting Strength gyms in 5 years
agree.KyleSchuant wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:34 am It's not necessarily a slight on SS or BLOC themselves that their numbers stagnate.
....
So again, it's not necessarily SS as such. It's just a tough industry with a big turnover of customers and staff.
They got 20 or so gyms out there, good on them.
Maybe 100 was just kinda hyperbole, and marketing-lies to get the ball rolling.