Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

Bands, chains, wraps, straps, racks... are you sure this is training related?

Moderators: mgil, Cody

Post Reply
User avatar
murphyreedus
Registered User
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:24 am
Location: Lasting Integrity
Age: 40

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#421

Post by murphyreedus » Fri May 28, 2021 7:43 am

augeleven wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 7:09 am 14" depth with holes spread 4" apart? lolwut
The only way it could be more perfect is if it came with a pair of those shorts.

User avatar
mbasic
Registered User
Posts: 9343
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
Age: 104

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#422

Post by mbasic » Fri May 28, 2021 9:30 am

augeleven wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 7:09 am 14" depth with holes spread 4" apart? lolwut
yeah, it says it "portable" ... that IS what its called...with the plywood base attached/included?
Also uses "ample space".
I don't know think they knew what words meant back then or something.

I mean, I could make that work .... for $99, if that's all I could spend.

User avatar
murphyreedus
Registered User
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:24 am
Location: Lasting Integrity
Age: 40

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#423

Post by murphyreedus » Fri May 28, 2021 10:09 am

mbasic wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 9:30 am
augeleven wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 7:09 am 14" depth with holes spread 4" apart? lolwut
yeah, it says it "portable" ... that IS what its called...with the plywood base attached/included?
Also uses "ample space".
I don't know think they knew what words meant back then or something.

I mean, I could make that work .... for $99, if that's all I could spend.

Yeah, it's "portable" in that it breaks down into the 2 sides, the chin bar, and the base, vs a fully welded cage. I was surprised to see it still sitting there after a month, but it sounds like the equipment market at PIAS has crashed hard. He had pallets and pallets of plates, tons of bars/dumbbells, machines, etc. and said that nothing was selling for the last few weeks. I think the only use I'd have for it is as a chin station, but at 79" it's pretty short, too.

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8476
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#424

Post by mgil » Fri May 28, 2021 10:12 am

@murphyreedus, a rack like that would be okay for a patio rack or something. I imagine using it like a weaker version of Bud Jeffries.

User avatar
murphyreedus
Registered User
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:24 am
Location: Lasting Integrity
Age: 40

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#425

Post by murphyreedus » Fri May 28, 2021 10:20 am

mgil wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 10:12 am @murphyreedus, a rack like that would be okay for a patio rack or something. I imagine using it like a weaker version of Bud Jeffries.
Maybe I can put it in the backyard and have the wife put some flowerbeds around it. Art meets utility, or something, plus it'll be exposed to the elements for graceful aging.

User avatar
murphyreedus
Registered User
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:24 am
Location: Lasting Integrity
Age: 40

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#426

Post by murphyreedus » Fri May 28, 2021 3:31 pm

Yeah, I got problems. It did come with the original plywood base, but I'll make a new one since it's a little trashed. PIAS guy actually throw in 2 pairs of vintage York Olympic collars with it for the $99, so I think I did OK vs the price of a Rip rack.

Image

User avatar
mbasic
Registered User
Posts: 9343
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:06 am
Age: 104

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#427

Post by mbasic » Fri May 28, 2021 3:54 pm

murphyreedus wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 3:31 pm Yeah, I got problems. It did come with the original plywood base, but I'll make a new one since it's a little trashed. PIAS guy actually throw in 2 pairs of vintage York Olympic collars with it for the $99, so I think I did OK vs the price of a Rip rack.
those four collars alone are worth $99 I suppose

The tabs at the end of the pins that keep them from falling out are interesting.


User avatar
Skander
Registered User
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:02 pm

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#428

Post by Skander » Fri May 28, 2021 4:07 pm

You just need to go on the SS forums and find a local acolyte who will give you $200+ for a real authentic man's rack that has already aged with its owner

hector
Registered User
Posts: 5102
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:54 pm

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#429

Post by hector » Fri May 28, 2021 4:40 pm

murphyreedus wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 3:31 pm Yeah, I got problems. It did come with the original plywood base, but I'll make a new one since it's a little trashed. PIAS guy actually throw in 2 pairs of vintage York Olympic collars with it for the $99, so I think I did OK vs the price of a Rip rack.

Image
$99?

That's a steal!!!

User avatar
murphyreedus
Registered User
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:24 am
Location: Lasting Integrity
Age: 40

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#430

Post by murphyreedus » Fri May 28, 2021 5:04 pm

Skander wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 4:07 pm You just need to go on the SS forums and find a local acolyte who will give you $200+ for a real authentic man's rack that has already aged with its owner
I haven't tried installing the safeties at angles yet, so I can't confirm if it's as functional as the SS racks.

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9715
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#431

Post by Wilhelm » Fri May 28, 2021 5:57 pm

Do the Rip racks have those gussets at the base of the uprights?

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8476
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#432

Post by mgil » Fri May 28, 2021 7:27 pm

Wilhelm wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 5:57 pm Do the Rip racks have those gussets at the base of the uprights?
I don’t think so.

While looking for a photo to confirm (I couldn’t find one), I stumbled upon this:

https://texasstrengthsystems.com/collec ... chalk-bowl

User avatar
Skander
Registered User
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:02 pm

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#433

Post by Skander » Sat May 29, 2021 7:10 am

mgil wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 7:27 pm
Wilhelm wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 5:57 pm Do the Rip racks have those gussets at the base of the uprights?
I don’t think so.

While looking for a photo to confirm (I couldn’t find one), I stumbled upon this:

https://texasstrengthsystems.com/collec ... chalk-bowl
They really phoned in that product photo. Literally it looks like they took that picture with a razr flip phone on their way to the bathroom.

User avatar
murphyreedus
Registered User
Posts: 1298
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:24 am
Location: Lasting Integrity
Age: 40

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#434

Post by murphyreedus » Sat May 29, 2021 7:41 am

How did I miss this? For when you want to make your pull-up bar 48% less usable?

https://texasstrengthsystems.com/collec ... r-ss-racks

User avatar
zappey1
Registered User
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:37 pm
Location: Washington State
Age: 41

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#435

Post by zappey1 » Sat May 29, 2021 8:49 am

murphyreedus wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:41 am How did I miss this? For when you want to make your pull-up bar 48% less usable?

https://texasstrengthsystems.com/collec ... r-ss-racks
SS PULL DOWNS!!!!

WTF I thought machines were fer pussboys

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8476
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#436

Post by mgil » Sat May 29, 2021 11:10 am

Skander wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:10 am
mgil wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 7:27 pm
Wilhelm wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 5:57 pm Do the Rip racks have those gussets at the base of the uprights?
I don’t think so.

While looking for a photo to confirm (I couldn’t find one), I stumbled upon this:

https://texasstrengthsystems.com/collec ... chalk-bowl
They really phoned in that product photo. Literally it looks like they took that picture with a razr flip phone on their way to the bathroom.
Yeah. Well, the whole thing looks phoned in. The 5 quart mixing bowl they got from Walmart isn’t even level.

The SS pull down is ridiculously overpriced.

Dale
Registered User
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 5:32 pm

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#437

Post by Dale » Sat May 29, 2021 6:22 pm

I have been using a York isometric rack for over 40 years. It was the only commercially available rack at the time and continues to be used several days a week.

I use a vintage York 7’ standard 1” heat treated bar.

It is a perfect size for a small home gym. It’s mounted on a 36”X 48” X 1.5” plywood.
I use 5/8” bolts and washers as j hooks and added a lat pull down cable.

True old school lifting at its best!

Dale
Registered User
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 5:32 pm

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#438

Post by Dale » Sat May 29, 2021 6:30 pm

Old school lifting at it’s best

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9715
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#439

Post by Wilhelm » Sun May 30, 2021 6:47 am

Damn. 40+ years is a pretty decent run.

I'd say keep up the good work, but that doesn't seem pertinent here. : )
Welcome to the site, @Dale

User avatar
Hardartery
Registered User
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:28 pm
Location: Fat City

Re: Why Antique York Racks Are Stupid

#440

Post by Hardartery » Sun May 30, 2021 9:55 am

Dale wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 6:22 pm I have been using a York isometric rack for over 40 years. It was the only commercially available rack at the time and continues to be used several days a week.

I use a vintage York 7’ standard 1” heat treated bar.

It is a perfect size for a small home gym. It’s mounted on a 36”X 48” X 1.5” plywood.
I use 5/8” bolts and washers as j hooks and added a lat pull down cable.

True old school lifting at its best!
Whatever works for you, I suppose. That doesn't make it a good rack though, any more than continuing to drive a 1971 Ford Maverick suddenly makes it a good car. Just sayin'. Good to see someone still lifting for that many years.

Post Reply