Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

All training and programming related queries and banter here

Moderators: mgil, chromoly, Manveer

Post Reply
User avatar
chrisd
Registered User
Posts: 2047
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:06 pm
Location: Ponyville
Age: 59

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#221

Post by chrisd » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:35 am

KyleSchuant wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:27 pm
chrisd wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:34 am A rather vague question with no quote. I'll be so bold as to assume you are asking me.
I was, my post was right after yours, which would be clearer if it wasn't on a new page. Your talk of having the showy muscles you wanted intrigued me. So thanks!
Yep, biceps division, pectoral striations, lat taper, hip flexors to make the waist look shorter, abzors, deltoids (even rear) the lot. Great so long as you want to keep going A Back, Chest, Biceps, Calves; B Thighs, Tris, Delts, Abs forever.

User avatar
cwd
Registered User
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:34 am
Location: central Ohio
Age: 58

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#222

Post by cwd » Wed Dec 13, 2017 6:27 am

KarlM wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:43 pmPerhaps the tendonitis issues that seem to be rampant among late intermediate/advanced lifters could be more effectively mitigated if volume wasn't over prescribed? This last bit is me talking out of my ass, but I do wonder?
True, the risk of an overuse injury with higher volume is high. It is addressed with lower intensity and using variant lifts.

I.e. I used to have terrible hip tendon problems doing 9 sets/week of low-bar squats @9-10 every week on SSLP

But I can handle 9 sets/week of a mix of low- and high-bar squats, some paused, @7-9 just fine.

User avatar
perman
Registered User
Posts: 1184
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:48 pm
Location: Near Oslo, Norway
Age: 39

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#223

Post by perman » Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:01 am

KarlM wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:43 pm Perhaps the tendonitis issues that seem to be rampant among late intermediate/advanced lifters could be more effectively mitigated if volume wasn't over prescribed? This last bit is me talking out of my ass, but I do wonder?
I can think of one big advantage the high volume/lower intensity approach might have, and that's cleaner technique. One of the main purposes of good technique is preventing injury, keeping a flat back in squats and deadlifts help prevent back injuries for instance.

My bias is also that enough people seem to recommend keeping the ego in check for lifting weights to prevent injuries, which is essentially what RPE is a scientific distillation of. Omar Isuf coincidentally just released a video today talking about this very issue:


My experience after having done both Jordan style RPE programs and TM is that the former made me feel generally better, though I am in a weird period now of not having had a lingering tendonitisish issue for a long while, not sure how much programming has had to do with it as much as having adjusted to initial issues.

AaronM
Pheasant
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:26 am
Location: TEXAS
Age: 37

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#224

Post by AaronM » Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:50 am

chrisd wrote: Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:30 am
unruhschuh wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:58 am

Big Beyond Belief seems to be written by Leo Costa. The pdf is an easy find on google, due to Roger Hardin abandoning his website. I love when that happens.
Was it ? it's been in a box for over twenty years. Platz probably gets a mention in it somewhere.

Anyway, it was based on increasing volume and shortening rests, mostly in the 8-15 rep range. Brief forays into lower rep ranges designed to increase strength and allow heavier weights to be used on the next cycle.

The magnificent muscle definition it produced, vanished within three to six months of stopping, leading me to believe that sarcoplasmic vs. myofibrillar hypertrophy may actually be a thing.
Interesting. Do you think progress could be made with both strength and hypertrophy in the long-run if someone alternated their training every 3 months or so? 12 weeks hypertrophy, 12 weeks strength focus, repeat? I'll treat myself to a get-swole program once I hit 3/4/5 on the main lifts.

User avatar
chrisd
Registered User
Posts: 2047
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:06 pm
Location: Ponyville
Age: 59

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#225

Post by chrisd » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:40 am

AaronM wrote: Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:50 am
chrisd wrote: Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:30 am
unruhschuh wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:58 am

Big Beyond Belief seems to be written by Leo Costa. The pdf is an easy find on google, due to Roger Hardin abandoning his website. I love when that happens.
Was it ? it's been in a box for over twenty years. Platz probably gets a mention in it somewhere.

Anyway, it was based on increasing volume and shortening rests, mostly in the 8-15 rep range. Brief forays into lower rep ranges designed to increase strength and allow heavier weights to be used on the next cycle.

The magnificent muscle definition it produced, vanished within three to six months of stopping, leading me to believe that sarcoplasmic vs. myofibrillar hypertrophy may actually be a thing.
Interesting. Do you think progress could be made with both strength and hypertrophy in the long-run if someone alternated their training every 3 months or so? 12 weeks hypertrophy, 12 weeks strength focus, repeat? I'll treat myself to a get-swole program once I hit 3/4/5 on the main lifts.
That sounds like block training. Also it sounds like Andy Baker's seasonal idea. Why not? 12 weeks on four blocks and some spare to mess around.

timelinex
Registered User
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:21 am

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#226

Post by timelinex » Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:26 am

AaronM wrote: Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:50 am
chrisd wrote: Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:30 am
unruhschuh wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:58 am

Big Beyond Belief seems to be written by Leo Costa. The pdf is an easy find on google, due to Roger Hardin abandoning his website. I love when that happens.
Was it ? it's been in a box for over twenty years. Platz probably gets a mention in it somewhere.

Anyway, it was based on increasing volume and shortening rests, mostly in the 8-15 rep range. Brief forays into lower rep ranges designed to increase strength and allow heavier weights to be used on the next cycle.

The magnificent muscle definition it produced, vanished within three to six months of stopping, leading me to believe that sarcoplasmic vs. myofibrillar hypertrophy may actually be a thing.
Interesting. Do you think progress could be made with both strength and hypertrophy in the long-run if someone alternated their training every 3 months or so? 12 weeks hypertrophy, 12 weeks strength focus, repeat? I'll treat myself to a get-swole program once I hit 3/4/5 on the main lifts.
Correct me if I'm wrong but thats literally what periodization is about.

User avatar
Murelli
Registered User
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:00 am
Location: January River, Emberwoodland
Age: 35
Contact:

Re: Post Novice? Turn Up The Volume.

#227

Post by Murelli » Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:29 am

Block periodization, maybe?

Post Reply