When are PRs reliable?
Moderators: mgil, chromoly, Manveer
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8494
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
When are PRs reliable?
I had this discussion with some eBuddies.
PR's under 5lbs get really dicey. Especially when you're not on calibrated or internally consistent equipment.
In my garage, I have an order to my plates and as such know, with decent certainty, if a PR claim is true. But if I were travelling from gym to gym, and not lifting on calibrated plates (or even old and worn calibrated ones), I don't know if PRs are feasible given plate tolerances (~2% for decent plates). If you're PR'ing a squat, and your last best was 500lbs in another gym, you'd need to PR by roughly 10lbs to be convinced that you've lifted more than before with accounting for error.
Basically, ~0.1% PRs on varying equipment don't count.
PR's under 5lbs get really dicey. Especially when you're not on calibrated or internally consistent equipment.
In my garage, I have an order to my plates and as such know, with decent certainty, if a PR claim is true. But if I were travelling from gym to gym, and not lifting on calibrated plates (or even old and worn calibrated ones), I don't know if PRs are feasible given plate tolerances (~2% for decent plates). If you're PR'ing a squat, and your last best was 500lbs in another gym, you'd need to PR by roughly 10lbs to be convinced that you've lifted more than before with accounting for error.
Basically, ~0.1% PRs on varying equipment don't count.
-
- Uke Star
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
- Location: Crassed
Re: When are PRs reliable?
I was coming into this thinking it would be about repeatability, as in you can reliably hit that lift again and again
For example, say I did 167.5 X5 and could consistently hit 5s over 160kg, but whenever I tried 170 it just died
Then last time I hit 172 X5
Am I gonna be able to do it again, or was it a product of arousal, circadian rhythm, what I'd eaten and done physically that day etc?
For example, say I did 167.5 X5 and could consistently hit 5s over 160kg, but whenever I tried 170 it just died
Then last time I hit 172 X5
Am I gonna be able to do it again, or was it a product of arousal, circadian rhythm, what I'd eaten and done physically that day etc?
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8494
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
Re: When are PRs reliable?
This is also important. Above and beyond the consistency of the weight on the bar is the ability of our own bodies to produce force.JC wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:59 am I was coming into this thinking it would be about repeatability, as in you can reliably hit that lift again and again
For example, say I did 167.5 X5 and could consistently hit 5s over 160kg, but whenever I tried 170 it just died
Then last time I hit 172 X5
Am I gonna be able to do it again, or was it a product of arousal, circadian rhythm, what I'd eaten and done physically that day etc?
I'm also interested in your arousal. How repeatable is that?
-
- Uke Star
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
- Location: Crassed
Re: When are PRs reliable?
Yes I think perhaps useable reliable strength trends are more important than individual PRs
As to the arousal, it very much varies according to the individual zones, although there is always applications for a nice bell curve and it's distribution
As to the arousal, it very much varies according to the individual zones, although there is always applications for a nice bell curve and it's distribution
- Hamburgerfan
- Possibly Vegan
- Posts: 842
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:38 am
Re: When are PRs reliable?
Not worth worrying about
- chromoly
- Magneto
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:36 pm
- Location: Academia
- Age: 35
Re: When are PRs reliable?
Maybe they don't count for actual weight, but they can have a a big mental effect. Microloading on different equipment might be silly, but mentally it helped me a lot when I was lifting at my grad school gym (equipped with those globogym-style rubber-coated hex plates). Maybe I was only PRing my squat on TM every 4 weeks, or maybe I was even lifting less than the week before, but it gave me a lot of confidence with heavier weights that I wouldn't necessarily have had without the microplates. I could tell myself "oh, it's just 2.5 lbs or 5 lbs more than last time." You might be de-emphasizing how important the mental aspect is to a newer trainee.
Nowadays I lift at a gym with Rogue competition and training bumpers, apparently within +/- 15 g of stated weight. But I don't even microload anymore, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Nowadays I lift at a gym with Rogue competition and training bumpers, apparently within +/- 15 g of stated weight. But I don't even microload anymore, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8494
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
Re: When are PRs reliable?
For a new trainee, yeah, I get it.
For a person who’s been training for years and claiming a 0.5lbs PR over a 23 month time span, I don’t think it matters.
For a person who’s been training for years and claiming a 0.5lbs PR over a 23 month time span, I don’t think it matters.
- chromoly
- Magneto
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:36 pm
- Location: Academia
- Age: 35
Re: When are PRs reliable?
Oh my god a 0.5 lb PR over 23 months. Not a PR*!
* OK I guess technically a PR**, but I am not impressed.***
** But only because PR means that you achieved something better than before, and a X + 0.5 is technically more than X.
*** Unless maybe you've horribly injured yourself and it's a "hooray I'm back to lifting pre-injury weights post-injury" PR. Or maybe you've lost weight.
* OK I guess technically a PR**, but I am not impressed.***
** But only because PR means that you achieved something better than before, and a X + 0.5 is technically more than X.
*** Unless maybe you've horribly injured yourself and it's a "hooray I'm back to lifting pre-injury weights post-injury" PR. Or maybe you've lost weight.
-
- Uke Star
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
- Location: Crassed
Re: When are PRs reliable?
Know what I think?
Someone weighed their plates recently, and all their microPR's suddenly went out the window!
Mmmm gil ol' buddy, what would it take for you to set a PR?
Someone weighed their plates recently, and all their microPR's suddenly went out the window!
Mmmm gil ol' buddy, what would it take for you to set a PR?
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8494
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
-
- Superstar
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:00 pm
Re: When are PRs reliable?
The Iron Grip rubber hex plates are calibrated within 2% fwiw.chromoly wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:13 pm Maybe they don't count for actual weight, but they can have a a big mental effect. Microloading on different equipment might be silly, but mentally it helped me a lot when I was lifting at my grad school gym (equipped with those globogym-style rubber-coated hex plates). Maybe I was only PRing my squat on TM every 4 weeks, or maybe I was even lifting less than the week before, but it gave me a lot of confidence with heavier weights that I wouldn't necessarily have had without the microplates. I could tell myself "oh, it's just 2.5 lbs or 5 lbs more than last time." You might be de-emphasizing how important the mental aspect is to a newer trainee.
Nowadays I lift at a gym with Rogue competition and training bumpers, apparently within +/- 15 g of stated weight. But I don't even microload anymore, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Dumb design, but not bad quality all around.
- simonrest
- Objectifies Monotremes
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:37 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Age: 44
Re: When are PRs reliable?
fuck you, I just PRed my leg press for sets of 8 at this bodyweight for a tuesday
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:16 pm
- Age: 57
- KyleSchuant
- Take It Easy
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Age: 52
- Contact:
Re: When are PRs reliable?
There was an article by some guy where he suggested you choose like five lifts and have PRs of 1 rep, 2 reps, all the way up to 10 reps, and even provided a little table for you. If you had fifty different PRs then probably all the equipment and day-to-day energy variation would be lost amongst that, but then you end up sounding like Simmo
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:00 am
Re: When are PRs reliable?
When Ed Coan tells you you're good for it, obviously.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:43 am
Re: When are PRs reliable?
No making PR posts on IG or you'll end up on this forum is probably a good rule of thumb.
-
- Uke Star
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
- Location: Crassed
Re: When are PRs reliable?
*Rule of Thom*
Blessed is he?
Blessed is he?
- mgil
- Shitpostmaster General
- Posts: 8494
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
- Location: FlabLab©®
- Age: 49
Re: When are PRs reliable?
Some things are absurd. Some things aren’t.ChasingCurls69 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:25 pm No making PR posts on IG or you'll end up on this forum is probably a good rule of thumb.
In reality, there has to be some concern for consistency of the weight. Also, the idea that the ability of the human body to replicate feats of strength with a high level of precision is misguided.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:49 am
- Age: 40
- Allentown
- Likes Beer
- Posts: 10019
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
- Age: 40