When are PRs reliable?

All training and programming related queries and banter here

Moderators: mgil, chromoly, Manveer

Post Reply
User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

When are PRs reliable?

#1

Post by mgil » Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:33 am

I had this discussion with some eBuddies.

PR's under 5lbs get really dicey. Especially when you're not on calibrated or internally consistent equipment.

In my garage, I have an order to my plates and as such know, with decent certainty, if a PR claim is true. But if I were travelling from gym to gym, and not lifting on calibrated plates (or even old and worn calibrated ones), I don't know if PRs are feasible given plate tolerances (~2% for decent plates). If you're PR'ing a squat, and your last best was 500lbs in another gym, you'd need to PR by roughly 10lbs to be convinced that you've lifted more than before with accounting for error.

Basically, ~0.1% PRs on varying equipment don't count.

JC
Uke Star
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
Location: Crassed

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#2

Post by JC » Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:59 am

I was coming into this thinking it would be about repeatability, as in you can reliably hit that lift again and again

For example, say I did 167.5 X5 and could consistently hit 5s over 160kg, but whenever I tried 170 it just died

Then last time I hit 172 X5

Am I gonna be able to do it again, or was it a product of arousal, circadian rhythm, what I'd eaten and done physically that day etc?

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#3

Post by mgil » Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:02 am

JC wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:59 am I was coming into this thinking it would be about repeatability, as in you can reliably hit that lift again and again

For example, say I did 167.5 X5 and could consistently hit 5s over 160kg, but whenever I tried 170 it just died

Then last time I hit 172 X5

Am I gonna be able to do it again, or was it a product of arousal, circadian rhythm, what I'd eaten and done physically that day etc?
This is also important. Above and beyond the consistency of the weight on the bar is the ability of our own bodies to produce force.

I'm also interested in your arousal. How repeatable is that?

JC
Uke Star
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
Location: Crassed

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#4

Post by JC » Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:08 am

Yes I think perhaps useable reliable strength trends are more important than individual PRs

As to the arousal, it very much varies according to the individual zones, although there is always applications for a nice bell curve and it's distribution

User avatar
Hamburgerfan
Possibly Vegan
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:38 am

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#5

Post by Hamburgerfan » Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:50 am

Not worth worrying about

User avatar
chromoly
Magneto
Posts: 946
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:36 pm
Location: Academia
Age: 35

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#6

Post by chromoly » Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:13 pm

Maybe they don't count for actual weight, but they can have a a big mental effect. Microloading on different equipment might be silly, but mentally it helped me a lot when I was lifting at my grad school gym (equipped with those globogym-style rubber-coated hex plates). Maybe I was only PRing my squat on TM every 4 weeks, or maybe I was even lifting less than the week before, but it gave me a lot of confidence with heavier weights that I wouldn't necessarily have had without the microplates. I could tell myself "oh, it's just 2.5 lbs or 5 lbs more than last time." You might be de-emphasizing how important the mental aspect is to a newer trainee.

Nowadays I lift at a gym with Rogue competition and training bumpers, apparently within +/- 15 g of stated weight. But I don't even microload anymore, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#7

Post by mgil » Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:15 pm

For a new trainee, yeah, I get it.

For a person who’s been training for years and claiming a 0.5lbs PR over a 23 month time span, I don’t think it matters.

User avatar
chromoly
Magneto
Posts: 946
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:36 pm
Location: Academia
Age: 35

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#8

Post by chromoly » Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:19 pm

Oh my god a 0.5 lb PR over 23 months. Not a PR*!

* OK I guess technically a PR**, but I am not impressed.***
** But only because PR means that you achieved something better than before, and a X + 0.5 is technically more than X.
*** Unless maybe you've horribly injured yourself and it's a "hooray I'm back to lifting pre-injury weights post-injury" PR. Or maybe you've lost weight.

JC
Uke Star
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
Location: Crassed

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#9

Post by JC » Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:22 pm

Know what I think?

Someone weighed their plates recently, and all their microPR's suddenly went out the window!

Mmmm gil ol' buddy, what would it take for you to set a PR?

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#10

Post by mgil » Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:30 pm

JC wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:22 pm Know what I think?

Someone weighed their plates recently, and all their microPR's suddenly went out the window!

Mmmm gil ol' buddy, what would it take for you to set a PR?
I dunno

KOTJ
Superstar
Posts: 1033
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:00 pm

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#11

Post by KOTJ » Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:20 pm

chromoly wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:13 pm Maybe they don't count for actual weight, but they can have a a big mental effect. Microloading on different equipment might be silly, but mentally it helped me a lot when I was lifting at my grad school gym (equipped with those globogym-style rubber-coated hex plates). Maybe I was only PRing my squat on TM every 4 weeks, or maybe I was even lifting less than the week before, but it gave me a lot of confidence with heavier weights that I wouldn't necessarily have had without the microplates. I could tell myself "oh, it's just 2.5 lbs or 5 lbs more than last time." You might be de-emphasizing how important the mental aspect is to a newer trainee.

Nowadays I lift at a gym with Rogue competition and training bumpers, apparently within +/- 15 g of stated weight. But I don't even microload anymore, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The Iron Grip rubber hex plates are calibrated within 2% fwiw.

Dumb design, but not bad quality all around.

User avatar
simonrest
Objectifies Monotremes
Posts: 2394
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:37 pm
Location: Sydney
Age: 44

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#12

Post by simonrest » Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:48 pm

fuck you, I just PRed my leg press for sets of 8 at this bodyweight for a tuesday

Hiphopapotamus
Registered User
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:16 pm
Age: 57

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#13

Post by Hiphopapotamus » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:04 pm

simonrest wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:48 pm fuck you, I just PRed my leg press for sets of 8 at this bodyweight for a tuesday
A.K.A. the Triple Lindy.

User avatar
KyleSchuant
Take It Easy
Posts: 2179
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 52
Contact:

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#14

Post by KyleSchuant » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:08 pm

There was an article by some guy where he suggested you choose like five lifts and have PRs of 1 rep, 2 reps, all the way up to 10 reps, and even provided a little table for you. If you had fifty different PRs then probably all the equipment and day-to-day energy variation would be lost amongst that, but then you end up sounding like Simmo :)

psmith
Registered User
Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:00 am

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#15

Post by psmith » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:19 pm

When Ed Coan tells you you're good for it, obviously.

ChasingCurls69
Registered User
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:43 am

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#16

Post by ChasingCurls69 » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:25 pm

No making PR posts on IG or you'll end up on this forum is probably a good rule of thumb.

JC
Uke Star
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:36 pm
Location: Crassed

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#17

Post by JC » Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:51 am

*Rule of Thom*

Blessed is he?

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#18

Post by mgil » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:03 am

ChasingCurls69 wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:25 pm No making PR posts on IG or you'll end up on this forum is probably a good rule of thumb.
Some things are absurd. Some things aren’t.

In reality, there has to be some concern for consistency of the weight. Also, the idea that the ability of the human body to replicate feats of strength with a high level of precision is misguided.

anelson
Registered User
Posts: 567
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:49 am
Age: 40

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#19

Post by anelson » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:38 am

JC wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:51 am *Rule of Thom*

Blessed is he?
Thom hath borne our washing machine, and run the race on our behalf. Blessed is he!

User avatar
Allentown
Likes Beer
Posts: 10019
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:41 am
Location: Grindville, West MI. Pop: 2 Gainzgoblins
Age: 40

Re: When are PRs reliable?

#20

Post by Allentown » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:58 am

anelson wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:38 am
JC wrote: Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:51 am *Rule of Thom*

Blessed is he?
Thom hath borne our washing machine, and run the race on our behalf. Blessed is he!
Blossid is he!

Post Reply