Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

What's a carb? A car part? What's a macro? A type of camera lens?

Moderator: Manveer

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#21

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:12 pm

mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:02 pm Here’s a dude around 290lbs at 6’. BMI is 39.3

Just an example...



(Hint: it’s @Cody and @Manveer’s bastard love child)
He is obese.

User avatar
Wilhelm
Little Musk Ox
Posts: 9718
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:58 pm
Location: Living Room
Age: 62

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#22

Post by Wilhelm » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:14 pm

Facepalm

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#23

Post by mgil » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:20 pm

@michael where’s your personal reference point?

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#24

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:27 pm

mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:20 pm @michael where’s your personal reference point?
Some people are three standard deviations from the mean. They exist. They are .3% you have to ignore them when you make general guidelines.

User avatar
Cody
Equipment Guru
Posts: 2047
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:14 am
Age: 39

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#25

Post by Cody » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:36 pm

michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:27 pm
mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:20 pm @michael where’s your personal reference point?
Some people are three standard deviations from the mean. They exist. They are .3% you have to ignore them when you make general guidelines.
Again, you've apparently not actually read any research into the applicability of BMI to assess individuals. It's not a valid as a granular tool.

You also haven't posted your own picture and qualifications to make such an assessment. Would you care to do so? From where I stand you're making baseless claims, and I'll not stand for trolling in the main forums.

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#26

Post by mgil » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:40 pm

michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:27 pm
mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:20 pm @michael where’s your personal reference point?
Some people are three standard deviations from the mean. They exist. They are .3% you have to ignore them when you make general guidelines.
What are the units of standard deviation in this case. What is sigma? Is the distribution approximately normal?

User avatar
Manveer
M3N4C3
Posts: 2411
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: CA
Age: 39

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#27

Post by Manveer » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:40 pm

Michael, are you familiar with Loctite’s product range?

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#28

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:41 pm

Manveer wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:40 pm Michael, are you familiar with Loctite’s product range?
I wasn't really trolling, but yeah not very productive.

I surrender.

PatrickDB
Have you read this study?
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:12 am

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#29

Post by PatrickDB » Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:46 pm

Cody wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:03 pm
michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:30 pm @Cody I thought natural was implied. Drugs change things.
Actually, I achieved my "fluffy" physique with female levels of test. In my 30s. Only lifting 2x a week.

[instagram]
Damn, this is a good reminder that I need to work harder.
Last edited by PatrickDB on Wed Jan 10, 2018 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
broseph
High Fiber
Posts: 4953
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:11 am
Location: West Michigan
Age: 41

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#30

Post by broseph » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:00 pm

michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:27 pm
mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:20 pm @michael where’s your personal reference point?
Some people are three standard deviations from the mean. They exist. They are .3% you have to ignore them when you make general guidelines.
Us lifty folks are the ones that defy what little applicability there is with BMI. A “should I cut or bulk?” table would be something tailored to lifty folks.

User avatar
mgil
Shitpostmaster General
Posts: 8494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: FlabLab©®
Age: 49

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#31

Post by mgil » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:11 pm

broseph wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:00 pm
michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:27 pm
mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:20 pm @michael where’s your personal reference point?
Some people are three standard deviations from the mean. They exist. They are .3% you have to ignore them when you make general guidelines.
Us lifty folks are the ones that defy what little applicability there is with BMI. A “should I cut or bulk?” table would be something tailored to lifty folks.
Agreed.

In defense of michael, this site is populated by people that are not regressing to the mean. Several of us have lengthy athletic or training exposure which skews results.

Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_mass_index) offers a nice summary along with limitations. Under the limitations is a scatter plot that clearly shows that the index has issues as well as the data looking to have possibly larger than expected variance.

User avatar
iamsmu
Registered User
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:52 pm
Location: Handicap: +.3
Age: 49
Contact:

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#32

Post by iamsmu » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:16 pm

No shirtless pic, but there some video in my latest log. . . .

I'm probably about 17% bf. I dunno. It's hard to say. The pictures on the site linked to below say probably 14 or 15, but I'm skeptical.

http://truth-dealer.com/physiology/fund ... ht-03.html

The holidays added 7 pounds and it surely wasn't pure muscle. Even before the holiday fat, I was still well into the overweight range. . . .

My BMI this morning was 27.4. My walking around weight today (~218# @ 6'2") put me at 28. Every time I see my PCP the office generates some automated BMI warning. My doctor ignores it.

If you want a metric that might be more useful, do your waist hip ratio. They've even started using this (in addition to BMI) at the health fares they run at work. (I don't go because my blood pressure is high and they'll tell me to make life style changes. . . .)

I'd really like to get to an obese level BMI with a BF of less than 12%. But that's pretty hard to do when you have insect legs.

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#33

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:21 pm

mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:11 pm Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_mass_index) offers a nice summary along with limitations. Under the limitations is a scatter plot that clearly shows that the index has issues as well as the data looking to have possibly larger than expected variance.
I was actually using BMI as a proxy for FFMI.

Probably 95% of people won't get a FFMI over 25. But yeah 5% is still a lot of people. People like @Cody.

It's a bad idea.

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#34

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:31 pm

iamsmu wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:16 pm (I don't go because my blood pressure is high and they'll tell me to make life style changes. . . .)
Are you on medication for it? Don't ignore high blood pressure. You can fix it with medicine. You don't need to make life style changes.

User avatar
Manveer
M3N4C3
Posts: 2411
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: CA
Age: 39

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#35

Post by Manveer » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:32 pm

FFMI is nothing like a proxy for BMI. Also >25 is possible naturally for a lot of people:


User avatar
iamsmu
Registered User
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:52 pm
Location: Handicap: +.3
Age: 49
Contact:

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#36

Post by iamsmu » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:35 pm

michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:21 pm
mgil wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:11 pm Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_mass_index) offers a nice summary along with limitations. Under the limitations is a scatter plot that clearly shows that the index has issues as well as the data looking to have possibly larger than expected variance.
I was actually using BMI as a proxy for FFMI.

Probably 95% of people won't get a FFMI over 25. But yeah 5% is still a lot of people. People like @Cody.

It's a bad idea.
I just found a nice ffmi calculator here:

http://www.naturalphysiques.com/28/fat- ... index-ffmi

To crack 25 ffmi, I'd have to get to 220 @ 12%bf. That would be incredibly difficult. I'll see if I can get over 24 this year (I doubt it. That would be 210 for 12%). Assuming bf of 15%, I'm 23.5 now. If I'm 17%, I'm 23.

Some of the elite crossfitters must be around 28 ffmi.

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#37

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:36 pm

Manveer wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:32 pm FFMI is nothing like a proxy for BMI. Also >25 is possible naturally for a lot of people:
I agree. Lots of people, but only a small percentage of people (its still a lot of people).

To go outside the BMI range I presented @ 15% body fat you need to have a FFMI > 25.

michael
Young Padawan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:34 pm

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#38

Post by michael » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:39 pm

iamsmu wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:35 pm Some of the elite crossfitters must be around 28 ffmi.
Probably does happen, but you'd need to be a statistical outlier.

User avatar
iamsmu
Registered User
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:52 pm
Location: Handicap: +.3
Age: 49
Contact:

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#39

Post by iamsmu » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:43 pm

What's Laocoon's bf and ffmi?

Image

I'd say he's about 8-10% and his ffmi is 25.

Bigger pics:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laoco%C3%B6n_and_His_Sons

User avatar
iamsmu
Registered User
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:52 pm
Location: Handicap: +.3
Age: 49
Contact:

Re: Bulk, Cut, or Recomp?

#40

Post by iamsmu » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:45 pm

michael wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:39 pm
iamsmu wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:35 pm Some of the elite crossfitters must be around 28 ffmi.
Probably does happen, but you'd need to be a statistical outlier.
Indeed. That's why people find it suspicious. But they come form a huge pool . . .

Post Reply